Become a Patron!

To Date which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for & why?

Which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for?


  • Total voters
    237
Status
Not open for further replies.

zephyr

Dirty Pirate Meg
VU Donator
Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Unlisted Vendor
I think he will accomplish none of his goals and things will only get worse. And that will be fault of both sides of the house who are all determined to see him fail. Judging by the memes a lot of you love to post, you all seem to think it’s just the democrats who oppose him and the republicans are all behind him. Is there another shadow gov within the gov that has trumps back? Wake up, everyone is against us, never mind trump.

Are you talking about 'President' Trump? Sorry, not reading the whole thread here, just gotta say...

He only had one goal, to get his face seen by Everyone, to stay in the news, to become even more famous and eventually more rich. I'd say he's doing pretty well with that goal.
/notafan/
 

Rossum

Gold Contributor
Member For 3 Years
hFv8U4r.jpg
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Are you talking about 'President' Trump? Sorry, not reading the whole thread here, just gotta say...

He only had one goal, to get his face seen by Everyone, to stay in the news, to become even more famous and eventually more rich. I'd say he's doing pretty well with that goal.
/notafan/
let me guess......you own a pussyhat and your pussy grabs back......does your entire reading list come off the bumper of Priuses?
 

skt239

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Are you talking about 'President' Trump? Sorry, not reading the whole thread here, just gotta say...

He only had one goal, to get his face seen by Everyone, to stay in the news, to become even more famous and eventually more rich. I'd say he's doing pretty well with that goal.
/notafan/

Honestly I always thought it was a publicity stunt for trump, I don’t think he really intended on winning. Just like time has said in a lot of his postings, there is a bunch of stuff trump could have done on his own and just didn’t. Seems like a lot of people around him had believed in the campaign agenda and he just was not serious about it.
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Honestly I always thought it was a publicity stunt for trump, I don’t think he really intended on winning. Just like time has said in a lot of his postings, there is a bunch of stuff trump could have done on his own and just didn’t. Seems like a lot of people around him had believed in the campaign agenda and he just was not serious about it.
oh yeah that makes sense... being villified by the entire corporate globalist media as a nazi and a racist is just the kind of publicity that's gonna fill his hotels.yep that's really the kind of name recognition you shoot for.
 

skt239

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
oh yeah that makes sense... being villified by the entire corporate globalist media as a nazi and a racist is just the kind of publicity that's gonna fill his hotels.yep that's really the kind of name recognition you shoot for.

He had to brand himself and when you do that, you have to set yourself apart from the competition. All the republicans are democrats under a different name. He went with a nationalist brand and they attacked him as a Nazi. Trump has always been more liberal than anything else over the years. Ten years ago, trump wouldn’t be seen in the same room as people like Bannon or Miller, that’s not good for the game show host business. It was a bad business move all around. He has no history of all this Maga stuff, I don’t see trump as someone who really ever gave a shit. That’s my opinion of the guy, he’s a lot of things but not a martyr for the working class.

But like you said previously, maybe he’s laying the ground work (unintentionally) for the real deal.
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
He had to brand himself and when you do that, you have to set yourself apart from the competition. All the republicans are democrats under a different name. He went with a nationalist brand and they attacked him as a Nazi. Trump has always been more liberal than anything else over the years. Ten years ago, trump wouldn’t be seen in the same room as people like Bannon or Miller, that’s not good for the game show host business. It was a bad business move all around. He has no history of all this Maga stuff, I don’t see trump as someone who really ever gave a shit. That’s my opinion of the guy, he’s a lot of things but not a martyr for the working class.

But like you said previously, maybe he’s laying the ground work (unintentionally) for the real deal.
you want name recognition you want to hype bussiness you don't involve yourself in the single most contentious,devicive,inflamatory arena in the world namely politics...you involve yourself in things like saving puppies and starting orphanges....you are gonna by definition alienate half the country...bussinessmen don't seek out ways to alienate potential customers.
 
Last edited:

Bobx

Bronze Contributor
Bronze Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Varney on State of the Union: Democrats looked like sore losers
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
He has no history of all this Maga stuff, I don’t see trump as someone who really ever gave a shit.

You keep saying that, but it is untrue. Trump has a long history of speaking about the issues he now has as policy. He has not changed most of them.

I get that you may have not seen Trump talk about political issues, I didn't either. I never watched Oprah or other talk shows. But, the interviews of Trump on those shows are available on youtube and I've found that Trump has been talking about these issues for a very long time. You can look them up.

For the record, I think Trump was sincere about MAGA and probably still is. I think the change in Trump on some policies is simply due to his now being surrounded by the swamp. He is now being influenced by people that he had no exposure to prior to the election because,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,well,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,they never thought he could win so they didn't bother.
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
He only had one goal, to get his face seen by Everyone, to stay in the news, to become even more famous and eventually more rich. I'd say he's doing pretty well with that goal.
/notafan/

You'd be wrong.

Trump would have got richer by running his companies. Without Trump, his companies and Trump, lose money. But that is good for us. As it turns out, Trump is running the country and the country is getting richer while Trump is personally getting poorer.

There is only one true correlation to draw. Whatever Trump runs, does much better while he is running it. Whether it's his business or the Country.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
So they are saying helicopters were flying ahead of train as spotters and CAP to protect it due to number of high profile congressional leaders on board.

So my question is how the hell does a garbage truck get on the tracks without them seeing it? Gates were reported to be down at scene from someone who saw video footage. No way that train was doing 70 mph at time of crash as there would be noting left of the cab of that truck at anywhere close to that speed.

be995f81e623cb5bca4810f37797833e95b2fdef8a6f6dea259c3a5a65ae46fc.jpg
 
Last edited:

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
How many for "trains loaded with congressmen with helicopter escorts hitting semis"?

One. Your question was, "So my question is how the hell does a garbage truck get on the tracks without them seeing it?".

The answer is in the video's. Trains can't stop, even if they see the truck. My Dad is/was an Engineer for the railroad. I'm afraid he's killed some people because while he knew they were on the tracks, he could not stop. Just had to go for the ride. It happens. RR crossings are dangerous.

My guess is that the train did not hit the truck at 70mph because it was slowing down but could not stop.
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
One. Your question was, "So my question is how the hell does a garbage truck get on the tracks without them seeing it?".

The answer is in the video's. Trains can't stop, even if they see the truck. My Dad is/was an Engineer for the railroad. I'm afraid he's killed some people because while he knew they were on the tracks, he could not stop. Just had to go for the ride. It happens. RR crossings are dangerous.

My guess is that the train did not hit the truck at 70mph because it was slowing down but could not stop.
who the hell leaves their truck on a railroad track
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I'm more interested in the media at this point and #releasethememo.

These are people that continually report information garnered(or claimed) from unnamed sources and have no qualms about printing/reporting secret government information. They certainly reported the information from Snowden. But for the last few days, people that make their money reporting news are literally saying that non leaked information from an actual congressmember with a real name accountable to the information should not be released and reported on.

That's just amazing. So called journalists claiming that news should not be reported. It certainly shows how fucked up the liberal media is.
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I'm more interested in the media at this point and #releasethememo.

These are people that continually report information garnered(or claimed) from unnamed sources and have no qualms about printing/reporting secret government information. They certainly reported the information from Snowden. But for the last few days, people that make their money reporting news are literally saying that non leaked information from an actual congressmember with a real name accountable to the information should not be released and reported on.

That's just amazing. So called journalists claiming that news should not be reported. It certainly shows how fucked up the liberal media is.
yep, same people who thought there was no problem with a Secretary of State with an illegal private server stashed under her bed, and 30,000 disappearing e-mails, a Secretary of State peddeling off 20% of our uranium to Putin who then she recieves a generous donation to her private foundation...a secretary of state sharing a laptop with a guy who sends dickpics to underage girls.....are suddenly miraculouslly interested in ...National Security...you can't make this shit up...it's like a Pink Panther movie...which would make a great movie,the problem is how many dumbfucks think it was normal
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
One. Your question was, "So my question is how the hell does a garbage truck get on the tracks without them seeing it?".

The answer is in the video's. Trains can't stop, even if they see the truck. My Dad is/was an Engineer for the railroad. I'm afraid he's killed some people because while he knew they were on the tracks, he could not stop. Just had to go for the ride. It happens. RR crossings are dangerous.

My guess is that the train did not hit the truck at 70mph because it was slowing down but could not stop.
Used to commute to on NJT to NYC every day was friendly with crew, often riding in cabs/engines, & I have been on 4 different trains that took out people. Horrible sound as you hear the parts hitting the undercarriage below your feet so I'm somewhat familiar.

Doesn't explain intact gates in down position though.
 
Last edited:

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I don't believe in coincidences...

But, it's hardly conceivable a truck on the tracks would do much damage to passengers.

Any attempt to harm passengers by the suicidal method of driving a truck in front of a train is an inept attempt at best. Very poor chances of success. They would have had a better chance to wrap a chain around a section of track and use the truck to yank the track out, lol. Or otherwise try to derail the train at speed. A garbage truck isn't going to do it. :giggle:

But, I suppose, if drivers do dumb shit, so can a really dumb would be assassin. I tend to doubt that anyone that would be smart enough to know that the train carried congressmen, it's route and what time it pass the intersection would come up with the peabrained idea to drive a garbage truck in front of it. That would be like me taking a week or so to find where elk are hanging out, taking the time to sneak up on them and then throwing a rock at 'em to attempt to fill my elk tag.
 
Last edited:

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
But, it's hardly conceivable a truck on the tracks would do much damage to passengers.

Any attempt to harm passengers by the suicidal method of driving a truck in front of a train is an inept attempt at best. Very poor chances of success. They would have had a better chance to wrap a chain around a section of track and use the truck to yank the track out, lol. Or otherwise try to derail the train at speed. A garbage truck isn't going to do it. :giggle:

But, I suppose, if drivers do dumb shit, so can a really dumb would be assassin.
Serves to shift the narrative & distract. Engine front wheels were off the track as it was. Emergency braking before impact makes derailment more likely. If the train had not slowed significantly before impact derailment & significant injuries to passengers would be probable.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
yeah the thing about Gowdy that always pissed me off, was that he was all talk and no action..the guys is brilliant,but he never seems to get the ball across the line,,,made me think he was just a gatekeeper for the swamp...also he supported a form of amnesty for illegals.
After thinking about it I figure Gowdy is on deck to replace Rod Rosenstein when they take him out. Maybe even Sessions.
 

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Serves to shift the narrative & distract. Engine front wheels were off the track as it was. Emergency braking before impact makes derailment more likely. If the train had not slowed significantly before impact derailment & significant injuries to passengers would be probable.

No significant injuries to passengers occurred. One garbage truck driver is dead. His passenger severly injured. If it was intentional, and it's doubtful, it was a piss poor attempt. ;)

Why go through all that dying when it's not likely to do anything? LOL.

No passengers were hurt in the below instance. And it answers how the gate could be down and intact. You'd think the would be assassins would at least watch a youtube video to see if their plan would work.

 
Last edited:

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
But, it's hardly conceivable a truck on the tracks would do much damage to passengers.

Any attempt to harm passengers by the suicidal method of driving a truck in front of a train is an inept attempt at best. Very poor chances of success. They would have had a better chance to wrap a chain around a section of track and use the truck to yank the track out, lol. Or otherwise try to derail the train at speed. A garbage truck isn't going to do it. :giggle:

But, I suppose, if drivers do dumb shit, so can a really dumb would be assassin. I tend to doubt that anyone that would be smart enough to know that the train carried congressmen, it's route and what time it pass the intersection would come up with the peabrained idea to drive a garbage truck in front of it. That would be like me taking a week or so to find where elk are hanging out, taking the time to sneak up on them and then throwing a rock at 'em to attempt to fill my elk tag.
I don't believe Andrew Brietbart died of natual causes...I don't believe the man that performed his autopsy, had a mysterious and lethal accident shortly after performing that autopsy..I don't believe Anton Scalia died a natural death I think he was murdered....now you are right odd accidents occur everyday...but it's the timing that has me concerned...we have it appears a war going on a shadow war within the various intelligence communities...the FBI and others don't feel the goverment should be left up to the people to run and they committed treason in order to see that they stayed in power...these are people who routinely make people die of "natural causes" at convenient times...and they want to stay in the shadows they don't want to be dragged into the light...and this whole accident could be an attempt to kill or it could just be sending a warning like the Mafia does..regardless I don't believe the secret service doesn't have the ability to make sure a truck isn't on a rail system being used by a large body of congressmen


Remember what Obama did with the IRS...first the media told us it was a couple of "rouge" agents..then it started climbing up the ladder all the way to Louis Lerner who fell on her sword to protect Obama....how similar is that to the bullshit we are seeing going on in the FBI...but with the FBI the stakes are much higher.....
 
Last edited:

skt239

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
You keep saying that, but it is untrue. Trump has a long history of speaking about the issues he now has as policy. He has not changed most of them.

I get that you may have not seen Trump talk about political issues, I didn't either. I never watched Oprah or other talk shows. But, the interviews of Trump on those shows are available on youtube and I've found that Trump has been talking about these issues for a very long time. You can look them up.

For the record, I think Trump was sincere about MAGA and probably still is. I think the change in Trump on some policies is simply due to his now being surrounded by the swamp. He is now being influenced by people that he had no exposure to prior to the election because,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,well,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,they never thought he could win so they didn't bother.

You are right about that I do say it and I’m incorrect. I still don’t think he is sincere like others around him.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I don't believe Andrew Brietbart died of natual causes...I don't believe the man that performed his autopsy, had a mysterious and lethal accident shortly after performing that autopsy..I don't believe Anton Scalia died a natural death I think he was murdered....now you are right odd accidents occur everyday...but it's the timing that has me concerned...we have it appears a war going on a shadow war within the various intelligence communities...the FBI and others don't feel the goverment should be left up to the people to run and they committed treason in order to see that they stayed in power...these are people who routinely make people die of "natural causes" at convenient times...and they want to stay in the shadows they don't want to be dragged into the light...and this whole accident could be an attempt to kill or it could just be sending a warning like the Mafia does..regardless I don't believe the secret service doesn't have the ability to make sure a truck isn't on a rail system being used by a large body of congressmen
Or it is all a play designed to make the sheep who woke believe there is a battle in the IC communities that they are winning by presenting narratives on boards like /pol/ to that effect. Play out a long slow "cleaning" of government, prosecute a couple of the obviously corrupt who became so sloppy they exposed your operation over years of arrogance & stupidity, and switch out the rest of the players until the sheep believe they won the war, relax & go to sleep again after wrapping up all the conspiracy theories there are in a nice neat bow. You lose 10% for a decade, but you will still enjoy a comfortable margin.

Then you can pick right up where you left off. Faces/names change but power players remain protected and raking it in like always.
 
Last edited:

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I don't believe Andrew Brietbart died of natual causes...I don't believe the man that performed his autopsy, had a mysterious and lethal accident shortly after performing that autopsy..I don't believe Anton Scalia died a natural death I think he was murdered....now you are right odd accidents occur everyday...but it's the timing that has me concerned...we have it appears a war going on a shadow war within the various intelligence communities...the FBI and others don't feel the goverment should be left up to the people to run and they committed treason in order to see that they stayed in power...these are people who routinely make people die of "natural causes" at convenient times...and they want to stay in the shadows they don't want to be dragged into the light...and this whole accident could be an attempt to kill or it could just be sending a warning like the Mafia does..regardless I don't believe the secret service doesn't have the ability to make sure a truck isn't on a rail system being used by a large body of congressmen


Remember what Obama did with the IRS...first the media told us it was a couple of "rouge" agents..then it started climbing up the ladder all the way to Louis Lerner who fell on her sword to protect Obama....how similar is that to the bullshit we are seeing going on in the FBI...but with the FBI the stakes are much higher.....

A bunch of GOP elite are not akin to Brietbart. The vast majority are bought and paid for.

These conspiracies get more ridiculous every day. Good hell, it was a garbage truck in front of a train and it didn't majorly hurt anybody but the people in the truck. All the good assassins must be in DAVOS.

Seth Rich is a mystery. A garbage Truck getting hit by a train, not so much. If that's the type of shady shit going on, we got nothing to worry about and I should get me a job as a political assassin because I can sure as fuck do better than driving a truck in front of a train that has little chance of success. To do what, take out Paul Ryan or another lying anti-Trump Republican? :giggle:

Some things are ligitimate concerns. Some are not. If your going to be taken seriously about real questionable shit like Seth Rich maybe chasing every tail is not the way to go. It harms ones credibility. ;)
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Looks like he turned it down though

EXCLUSIVE: Gowdy Was Approached For Federal Judgeship
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/31/gowdy-approached-federal-judgeship/

Probably gonna be RR's spot & eventually AG or he is going to take over DCI.

DCI makes most sense with his Intelligence Committee experience or Possibly Independent Special Prosecutor looking into FBI/CIA/IC Deep State corruption.
 
Last edited:

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
A bunch of GOP elite are not akin to Brietbart. The vast majority are bought and paid for.

These conspiracies get more ridiculous every day. Good hell, it was a garbage truck in front of a train and it didn't majorly hurt anybody but the people in the truck. All the good assassins must be in DAVOS.

Seth Rich is a mystery. A garbage Truck getting hit by a train, not so much. If that's the type of shady shit going on, we got nothing to worry about and I should get me a job as a political assassin because I can sure as fuck do better than driving a truck in front of a train that has little chance of success. To do what, take out Paul Ryan or another lying anti-Trump Republican? :giggle:

Some things are ligitimate concerns. Some are not. If your going to be taken seriously about real questionable shit like Seth Rich maybe chasing every tail is not the way to go. It harms ones credibility. ;)
maybe so
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VU Sponsors

Top