Become a Patron!

To Date which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for & why?

Which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for?


  • Total voters
    237
Status
Not open for further replies.

chopdoc

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee
34f890.jpg
 

chopdoc

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee
Can see you are having trouble too, that's your second double post of the morning. VU is bogging bad.

The whole internet is laggin today but yeah, VU is slow and with issues on good days. Usually I just live with it when it shows your post 8 hrs after ya posted. Yesterday afternoon after posting a few times I get a notice on VU of new post. It was yours from 7 am.
 

chopdoc

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee
Once again the Supreme Court FUCKED every american in this country.

we really do need a civil war bad. The country is gone.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Last edited:

PoppaVic

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Cuz, colors, lines, racist... But the part I liked was them claiming they have no precedent/data from which to work - other than racism.
 

PoppaVic

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Supreme Court Won’t Allow Trump Administration To Add A Citizenship Question To Census For Now
The plaintiffs said the Trump administration’s justification for adding the question was a lie.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/supr...BaZHrzJPVXqCCp_9vsWH8ki7sEnY8AbV3-_mcMnC-jyX6

They need to take Roberts out now. A dirty Chief Justice of the Supreme court cannot be allowed to continue.
well, the dumbasses did "shop around" for logic supporting it.

But the absolute main-case is simple: that exact info is necessary to apportioning seats and dollars. So, either the supremes get a clue before 2020, or trump and his admin have to "estimate" - and, oh, I'd love that - but the left then gets frothing-stories for the next 4 years.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
well, the dumbasses did "shop around" for logic supporting it.

But the absolute main-case is simple: that exact info is necessary to apportioning seats and dollars. So, either the supremes get a clue before 2020, or trump and his admin have to "estimate" - and, oh, I'd love that - but the left then gets frothing-stories for the next 4 years.
Thing is, they purposely ran the clock down on issuing this decision in the last remaining days of the SCOTUS session so it would be near impossible for them to comply in time to perform the Census with the question intact. That underhanded bullshit is Roberts, in no uncertain terms. Granted, Barr will be arguing the case now, where he was not in place when the SCOTUS case was heard by the Court, so Trump admin may still manage to comply.

SCOTUS Blocks 2020 Census Citizenship Question – Chief Justice Roberts Sides with Liberals
 
Last edited:

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
wtf.. the lowers said no, the higher sez "can't tell", then the higher sez "oh, and he lied - try it all again??"

I have lived waay too long.
Why do you think I keep posting articles on it? It is such a ridiculous ruling, but at least the door is open for Barr to get involved & possibly straighten it out.
 

chopdoc

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee

casketweaver

Bronze Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee
Are there any true conservatives left? Or just republicans?
It depends on what one would classify as a conservative.

as I stated in a post earlier I am what I would consider and what most people would consider a fiscal conservative. I also have somewhat conservative values like family unit. A family should never under any circumstances be separated or broken down by the state or federal government.

then on the other side of that same coin I also believe in freedom in liberty and choice.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 

The Cromwell

I am a BOT
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
It depends on what one would classify as a conservative.

as I stated in a post earlier I am what I would consider and what most people would consider a fiscal conservative. I also have somewhat conservative values like family unit. A family should never under any circumstances be separated or broken down by the state or federal government.

then on the other side of that same coin I also believe in freedom in liberty and choice.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
The current Republicans are not fiscal conservatives.
and they no longer tout personal responsibility, they claim victim status just like liberals do.
A family unit as in immigrants?
Or as in abusive parents?
 

casketweaver

Bronze Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee
The current Republicans are not fiscal conservatives.
and they no longer tout personal responsibility, they claim victim status just like liberals do.
A family unit as in immigrants?
Or as in abusive parents?

Current Republicans are NOT Fiscally Conservative, you are correct. And I do agree the current "conservatives" are no longer "conservative" in policy or in nature. They're more progressive than they used to be.

A family unit is just that, both participants, with (or without children) working cohesively to provide a stable future for themselves and those under their roof.

Immigrants, if they come through LEGITIMATELY, there would be no separation, correct?

Abusive households should be dismantled immediately. When I said "Under no circumstance" I mean, giving incentives to single parents.

Clarification needed there, thank you.
 

The Cromwell

I am a BOT
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Current Republicans are NOT Fiscally Conservative, you are correct. And I do agree the current "conservatives" are no longer "conservative" in policy or in nature. They're more progressive than they used to be.

A family unit is just that, both participants, with (or without children) working cohesively to provide a stable future for themselves and those under their roof.

Immigrants, if they come through LEGITIMATELY, there would be no separation, correct?

Abusive households should be dismantled immediately. When I said "Under no circumstance" I mean, giving incentives to single parents.

Clarification needed there, thank you.
I differ in one respect even illegal immigrant families should be kept together. detained together, accepted together or deported together.

I agree illegal immigration is illegal and should be enforced.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VU Sponsors

Top