https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014519
J jimbodaddy74 Bronze Contributor Member For 4 Years ECF Refugee Feb 20, 2020 #1 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014519
gsmit1 Platinum Contributor Member For 4 Years Feb 20, 2020 #2 jimbodaddy74 said: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014519 Click to expand... I don't know if I've ever seen this much shadiness surrounding a public issue like this. The d0pe publications have from the start been altogether more reliable than the medical professionals for Pete's sake.
jimbodaddy74 said: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.014519 Click to expand... I don't know if I've ever seen this much shadiness surrounding a public issue like this. The d0pe publications have from the start been altogether more reliable than the medical professionals for Pete's sake.
Rhianne Diamond Contributor Member For 2 Years ECF Refugee Feb 20, 2020 #3 This was that Glantz “study”. I hope it stays gone!
cheepshot Member For 4 Years Feb 22, 2020 #4 Good catch, here's a site I look at once in a while for a laugh. https://retractionwatch.com/ The Hall of Shame is the best.
Good catch, here's a site I look at once in a while for a laugh. https://retractionwatch.com/ The Hall of Shame is the best.