5150sick
Under Ground Hustler
Staff member
VU Administrator
Senior Moderator
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Press Corps
Member For 5 Years
Mod Team Leader
Become a Patron!
Teen Vaping Is Bad. So Are Many Ad Campaigns Against Teen Vaping.
- Thread starter 5150sick
- Start date
A lot of kids will try smoking or vaping because of these ads. When will they learn about the push back effect of this propaganda?
Thanks, 5150. Good article.
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. It is amazing that people still don’t realize that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It seems to work really quickly with kids!
Because really there’s no teen vaping epidemic. The numbers are inflated. But they’ll keep trotting that out, along with the “vaping illness” to push through prohibition.
no, there isn't a "real" epidemic. and "they" don't want prohibition = no kids vaping = no money. and even if the kids did stopping vaping totally, "they" would still say there is an epidemic, to get the money.
To what, push kids to smoke? Or to tax the hell out of vaping stuff?
I was thinking that Deeming is so close now, and there’s this Corona thing everywhere now. They should really just push off any decision for a few years, but that would be too normal to do prolly!
no no. anti-vapors have nothing to do with vaping or tobacco. other than they use the issue to get money.
they actually want the "so called" problems to get bigger , so they can get more money.
they would "love" to see more people dieing from vaping = more money.
they actually want the "so called" problems to get bigger , so they can get more money.
they would "love" to see more people dieing from vaping = more money.
Oh, those Truth Initiative and Tobacco Free Kids a@@holes. I forgot about them getting kickbacks.
No wonder they keep trotting out the same vaping illness stuff! And the non vaping people don’t have a clue. :growl:
Last edited:
they get donations and grants. for every $100 they get, $95 goes in their pockets. the rest goes to propaganda.
Start with this one IMO. http://www.sciencemagazinedigital.o...cle.action?articleId=1545463#articleId1545463
That may be slightly overstated, but only slightly.
