Even if you see this first line as false in respects to
how you define a thing, you're still correct in point this out as a good thing. No, I'm not attempting to be argumentative in stating you define a thing differently than others. It is merely statement of fact, you do, they do.
For example what you call a dresser, a free standing cabinet with drawers for clothing. Me and my wife at one time called a bed and used it to have some passionate intercourse on top of it. Does mean we were wrong in that instant to define bed as the top of a dresser? No, not really. If anything it meant we were both rather aroused and did not care where we had sex, so long as we did what in the vernacular is called some serious bumping of uglies.
How people define things, ideas, places is subjective factually stated. There is no need to argue over it except in a few rare cases. Murder will always be murder, rape is always rape, spades are always spades. In those cases there is no need to argue either as they are self-evident, anyone can see the spade for what exists as being. No one has to define it.
Now, to how you are correct point this out as a good thing and my quote of "What does the law say about ecigarettes?" You are correct it is a good thing first to point out good information. Second you are correct because the information shows me that some who are legislating, regulating vaping in authoritative positions actually "get it".
How is that evident from the information? Well Michagan Public Act 18 of 2019;
"Defines e-cigarettes, alternative nicotine products, vapor products, and other emerging tobacco products
separately from tobacco products;"
Look at that they clearly and emphatically state they define vapor products separately from tobacco products. Even further so, they leave the gap open for "other emerging tobacco products", that will be still be defined as separate from tobacco products.
Yes it also seems they are highlighting that adults should act as adults, and avoid allowing minors to have vaping products. That
to me seems perfectly reasonable, sane, legitimate. We normally do not allow minors to go happily play with thermite, C4, symtex, dynamite, flash bang grenades, heavy artillery either and that seems to work out well. Nor are minors supposed to be allowed to use firearms unsupervised and if that is the case it
usually does well too.
All in, I think you are correct, this is a good thing.