Become a Patron!

Aspire 35A 3000mAh 18650...preposterously overrated,

The Cromwell

I am a BOT
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Bench Test Results: Aspire 35A 3000mAh 18650...preposterously overrated, incorrect Aspire dataMOOCH self.electronic_cigarette

Submitted 3 hours ago * by Mooch315

Bottom Line: This one made me angry but they are willing to rewrap. Aspire has a good reputation so my expectations were high. But for this cell they decided to roll us back a couple years and use a hugely exaggerated current rating without mentioning it is some sort of “pulse” rating.

The wrap on this cell just says “35A”. We can only assume, since there is no (useless) “max” or pulse” designation, that it means this cell is rated to 35A even for a continuous discharge. Except that during a continuous discharge at that level the cell gets hot enough to boil water and one cell failed during its first discharge at 35A.

All credit to Mooch, this post is from a Mooch post on ECR.
https://www.reddit.com/r/electronic_cigarette/comments/90ehzg/bench_test_results_aspire_35a_3000mah/
 

KingPin!

In my defence, I was left unsupervised ^^
VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
VU Challenge Team
Reviewer
When will these companies learn we have a mooch in our arsenal..
 

The Cromwell

I am a BOT
VU Donator
Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
And just when Aspire had our guard down because of pretty accurate wrappers...
I can never trust a rewrap.

they can put anything under the wrapper.
And just because one sample tests ok they may change the cell next week.
And mooch saying that a tested rewrap is on may give them incentive to change the cell....
Unfortunate but true.
 

VU Sponsors

Top