http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/...ivery&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And it begins...
Thanks for posting.
The American juice industry is a loose cannon. There are no printed standards, no stated tolerances, and no laboratory type certifications. That doesn't even count Chinee juice!
'Til now, we've been lucky... VERY lucky. Any numbnuts with a measuring cup can call himself a juice manufacturer.
Now I'm seeing more and more references to 'Stop Smoking' and 'FDA approved' in e-cig ad media.
Regs have been needed for a looong time...
Calm down... think it through... (andknowlearn who your enemies are. BTW, hysterics are a loser in debate.)
The juice industry has made no effort I'm aware of to police itself. And that ain't good.
Nicotine is an addictive drug... and a poison...
and is being absorbed into the body through the most sensitive, delicate mucous membranes that exist: lung tissue. And the politicos are watching... and salivating at their share of that $1B.
My belief is that we need our own independent private certifying body to establish basic national certification standards for product, staff, and lab protocols in the manufacture of juice.
It would be supported by the vaping industry, specifically juice makers, and their customers.
Certification would be voluntary and have a cost associated with it. There might be several levels of certification.
The juice lab would have to open it's doors to inspection by the oversight organization as well.
And after the first two or three hundred juice mfrs passed and were certified, customers would naturally favor these "certified" companies, driving the fly-by-nights and outhouse mixers out of business.
It would also help to legitimize vaping and create the warm and fuzzy political perception that we actually give a fuck.
An analogy:
Let's say you have a machine shop and you wanna make jet parts for a new customer, Boeing. But before Boeing will consider becoming your customer, your shop must be certed by both ISO (Int'l Standards Org) and AS-9100. (American aerospace) These are private companies, whose standards and operations are supported entirely by the industry... the self regulating industry.
There is no government or legal requirement to be certified by either organization; but Boeing demands it. And so does every other aircraft manufacturer on the planet.
Compliance is voluntary... but if you don't comply, you will have no customers.
Higher taxes are inevitable, and fairly justifiable. But federal or state regulation will be a nightmare.
We need to SELF regulate but we do not.
I am aware of the difference; that's why I was careful to use the word ANALOGY... so as not to... confuse anyone.
Plus it appears you didn't read well before you responded. Who the hell is talking about B&Ms? or safety concerns???
I'm talking about juice manufacturers and government regulation concerns.
But hey, yer' prolly right...
Better to just sit here with our collective thumb up our ass and wait for politicians to have ALL juice manufacturers REQUIRED BY LAW to comply with federal and state licensing reqs and send all that certification money to the government instead of our own pro-vape agency.
But you say we don't need any o' that self-imposed safety crap... Nothin' special about juice...
And vapers wouldn't pay anything extra for an industry safety or ingredient purity certification anyway...
Those are your words, Right?
Holee crap.
Both bring somewhat valid claims and concerns up.
So, let's take this regulation comparison up another step.
Let's look at the whole controversial GMO safety/labeling issue. GMO being genetically modified organisms.
Right now, Vermont is the only state to have passed legislation requiring GMO's to be labeled as such.
Currently, there is no way to find out whether or not a product you are consuming contains GMO's.
There is an independent agency called the Non-GMO project that is the only 3rd party verification program that certifies whether a product does not contain GMO's. They have a following of many people looking to avoid GMO's without the added cost of eating 100% Organic, Certified by the USDA.
So, in theory although differences exist, you could see how this could be beneficial to both consumers and manufacturers. At the end of the day, would you be willing to buy from a manufacture who has passed the verification process? Let's say in terms of simplicity of having an ISO certified Cleanroom and pass an industry standard chemical analysis testing per batch/lot?
Personally I would feel a lot safer and would probably pay the attributed increase costs, because all the government is waiting for is a few more slip ups. They are only looking to regulate based on damage control, generally speaking.
If we, as an industry could establish a recognized industry standard certification, I think it would only increase consumer & government trust.
And, just for shits and giggles, let's take a look at how the cannabis industry is starting to adopt such practices of certification and implementation.
Both bring somewhat valid claims and concerns up.
So, let's take this regulation comparison up another step.
Personally I would feel a lot safer and would probably pay the attributed increase costs, because all the government is waiting for is a few more slip ups. They are only looking to regulate based on damage control, generally speaking.
If we, as an industry could establish a recognized industry standard certification, I think it would only increase consumer & government trust.
And, just for shits and giggles, let's take a look at how the cannabis industry is starting to adopt such practices of certification and implementation.