Did S. Glantz really say that ?

I do not know if you ever heard about this "association" which is called "Fatherly" (Fatherly is a digital lifestyle brand that provides news, expert advice, product recommendations and other resources for parents) but I (accidentaly, while searching an explanation of a comment published in a french site) found an article published by Yahoo but written by Fatherly, partially & apparently based on S Glantz opinions on E-Cig.

https://www.fatherly.com/health-science/scientific-dangers-of-vaping/

I am really horrified to read that ! Either he said that and he's even more stupid than I thought, or this is a misleading interpretation from Fatherly … in both cases this is incomprehensible !

The propaganda war intensifies. Glantz has a long track record of distortions and even outright lies.

I found an article written by Clive Bates that could be an answer to the last Glantz's comments (could be as the Fatherly does not give its sources).

https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-r...ging-false-dangerous-claim-by-stanton-glantz/

murmeldeier said:

https://www.clivebates.com/vaping-r...ging-false-dangerous-claim-by-stanton-glantz/

Click to expand...

Good find.