Here it Comes! The WISMEC Reuleaux RX200S

Roadtrip635 · May 5, 2016

Well vapers it looks like the newest version of the RX200 will be out soon! The new version will be called the RX200S

It looks like the Reuleaux DNA 200, but will have the beautiful Joyetech screen and improved the 510 connection! I don't know what changes they will make with the chip, but so far this looking like the RX200 upgrade we've been hoping for. It's already up for pre-sale! http://www.heavengifts.com/WISMEC-Reuleaux-RX200S-TC-Express-Kit.html

HvyMtl · May 5, 2016

Roadtrip635 said:
Well vapers it looks like the newest version of the RX200 will be out soon! The new version will be called the RX200S

It looks like the Reuleaux DNA 200, but will have the beautiful Joyetech screen and improved the 510 connection! I don't know what changes they will make with the chip, but so far this looking like the RX200 upgrade we've been hoping for. It's already up for pre-sale! http://www.heavengifts.com/WISMEC-Reuleaux-RX200S-TC-Express-Kit.html

I believe there's also a 75 Watter coming soon.

Wingsfan0310 · May 5, 2016

HvyMtl said:
I believe there's also a 75 Watter coming soon.

It wouldn't surprise me since Evolve has one coming out.

Looks like with the new RX200 they are going with their DNA200 color scheme. I guess they hope to confuse people into thinking it's a DNA200

. I wonder if this means they will no longer be making the DNA200 Reuleaux?

Cheers,
Steve

Mythical_OD · May 5, 2016

If they keep the price on par with the RX200, Ill buy one. The original RX was the best $40 I ever spent. Thing is a great workhorse beater mod. I carried the thing with me everywhere almost everyday for 3 months, thrown it around, dropped it, vaped it super hot, bumped and hit and rattled it around, and its still working great. Paint is rubbing off on the bottom and the face plate paint is cracked and spiderwebbed, but thats the worst of it.

skt239 · May 5, 2016

If its under $60 I'll pick one up for sure. The new features look cool but the one that interest me most and what would motivate me to buy it is the improved 510.

ademel692 · May 5, 2016

Unless they have made major improvements on tc mode esp. ss mode a different screen isn't enough for me to buy another rx esp. (I assume) at a higher price

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

ademel692 · May 5, 2016

Mythical_OD said:
If they keep the price on par with the RX200, Ill buy one. The original RX was the best $40 I ever spent. Thing is a great workhorse beater mod. I carried the thing with me everywhere almost everyday for 3 months, thrown it around, dropped it, vaped it super hot, bumped and hit and rattled it around, and its still working great. Paint is rubbing off on the bottom and the face plate paint is cracked and spiderwebbed, but thats the worst of it.

I can attest to this. I take my bitch on the job with me have dropped it, accidentally set it in a small but of water . Had many" oh shit this mods done " moments but it takes the beating and comes back for more

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Roadtrip635 · May 5, 2016

skt239 said:
If its under $60 I'll pick one up for sure. The new features look cool but the one that interest me most and what would motivate me to buy it is the improved 510.

Me too. I've had been thinking about getting another RX200, but held off hoping to see them improve that 510. Now that they've gone and done that, along with the other changes, it will be an instabuy for me. I'm curious to see if they decide to offer in other colors, but I do like that two-tone silver look.

skt239 · May 5, 2016

Roadtrip635 said:
Me too. I've had been thinking about getting another RX200, but held off hoping to see them improve that 510. Now that they've gone and done that, along with the other changes, it will be an instabuy for me. I'm curious to see if they decide to offer in other colors, but I do like that two-tone silver look.

I'll also be holding out for other colors and hopefully a price drop.

Breazy_Com · May 5, 2016

I want two of them lol

cascadian · May 5, 2016

Wingsfan0310 said:
I guess they hope to confuse people into thinking it's a DNA200 .

Nope... No confusion possible with the huge display.

Wingsfan0310 said:
I wonder if this means they will no longer be making the DNA200 Reuleaux?

Yep... I believe it is customary to end business relationships with companies that are suing you.

R34SKYLINE · May 5, 2016

Looks good. Hopefully they realize we all want more color options.

ej1024 · May 5, 2016

Too many DNA REULEAx shells
Not enough DNA boards lol...
Oh well.. That looks amazing

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BillW50 · May 5, 2016

I'll be darn. They did improve the 510. "To power your build, Wismec and Jay Bo listened to fans of their product and improved the 510 pin; The new Reuleaux now has a stainless steel spring loaded 510 connection."

https://101vape.com/mods/1105-reuleaux-rx200s-200w-tc-box-mod-by-wismec-jay-bo-designs.html

mjag · May 5, 2016

I was always hoping they would offer the RX200 in the DNA color option, thanks to Evolv for making this possible

TechnoGeek · May 5, 2016

ademel692 said:
Unless they have made major improvements on tc mode esp. ss mode a different screen isn't enough for me to buy another rx esp. (I assume) at a higher price

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Hello,

Just curious, does TC not work for you with SS? TC is about all I use anymore, and it works fine for me..... I'm currently using TC with 316l coils on the Cuboid and RX200 works fine. I'm using SS316L spaced coils, standard, Claptons, and Fused Claptons..... resistance anywhere between .14 - .5ohms, dual coils....On the Joyetech/Wismec standard SS316 works, or TCR anywhere between 92 and 108 seems to work depending on the coil....

TechnoGeek · May 5, 2016

BillW50 said:
I'll be darn. They did improve the 510. "To power your build, Wismec and Jay Bo listened to fans of their product and improved the 510 pin; The new Reuleaux now has a stainless steel spring loaded 510 connection."

https://101vape.com/mods/1105-reuleaux-rx200s-200w-tc-box-mod-by-wismec-jay-bo-designs.html

I was wondering the same thing, if they fixed it/changed it....

and posted this...

http://vapingunderground.com/thread...mod-newest-free-shipping.234961/#post-1126770

I didn't see this part....

SPECIFICATIONS:

Dimensions: 50mm x 40mm x 84mm
*NEW* Stainless Steel Spring Loaded 510 Connection
*NEW* 0.96in OLED Display
Output Modes:
- Variable Wattage
  - Output Wattage: 1W - 200W
  - Resistance Range: 0.1 Ω - 3.5 Ω
- Temperature Control and TCR (Temperature Coefficient of Resistance)
  - Supports Ni200, Titanium, and Stainless Steel
  - Resistance Range: 0.05 Ω - 1.5 Ω
  - Temperature Range: 100°C - 315°C / 200°F - 600°F
Requires (3) 18650 High Drain Batteries (sold separately)
- Recommended 25A or Higher
Micro USB Port
- Charging (We recommend using an external charger)
- Firmware Upgradeable

Specifically the NEW part!

NICE!!!!!!

BillW50 · May 5, 2016

TechnoGeek said:
Hello,

Just curious, does TC not work for you with SS? TC is about all I use anymore, and it works fine for me..... I'm currently using TC with 316l coils on the Cuboid and RX200 works fine. I'm using SS316L spaced coils, standard, Claptons, and Fused Claptons..... resistance anywhere between .14 - .5ohms, dual coils....On the Joyetech/Wismec standard SS316 works, or TCR anywhere between 92 and 108 seems to work depending on the coil....

What hardware and firmware versions on yours? My two has hardware v1.04 and the firmware v3.1 and it will often just go into temperature protect the instant you touch the fire button with SS TC. Reflashing worked once the first time and then later it won't do SS TC anymore. Ni TC still works.

ademel692 · May 5, 2016

TechnoGeek said:
Hello,

Just curious, does TC not work for you with SS? TC is about all I use anymore, and it works fine for me..... I'm currently using TC with 316l coils on the Cuboid and RX200 works fine. I'm using SS316L spaced coils, standard, Claptons, and Fused Claptons..... resistance anywhere between .14 - .5ohms, dual coils....On the Joyetech/Wismec standard SS316 works, or TCR anywhere between 92 and 108 seems to work depending on the coil....

Yesi have problems with consistency.. sometimes it will work and usually it reverts back to wattage mode only when i build tho is when i encounter the problems. If i get factory made stainless coils (i have tfv4 tank ) then it works great. I enjoy building tho so now when i build with ss316 i just use wastage mode woth no problems. My nickel builds work fine in tc tho but even after the firmware update for ss316 optimization it still remains unreliable .i do contact coils btw

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Mythical_OD · May 5, 2016

Think it's vape101 that's got it pre-sale for 45 bucks. Basically the same as the current rx200

TechnoGeek · May 5, 2016

BillW50 said:
What hardware and firmware versions on yours? My two has hardware v1.04 and the firmware v3.1 and it will often just go into temperature protect the instant you touch the fire button with SS TC. Reflashing worked once the first time and then later it won't do SS TC anymore. Ni TC still works.

That's weird, I seem to have exactly the same as yours hardware 1.04, firmware 3.10....

One issue I do have is the 510 issue on the RX200 with certain attys...Example, the Vapresso Gemini RTA is the WORST! The 510 pin is way too long. ATTY doesn't sit flush. BUT even if you don't try to get it to sit flush, just snug, issues with TC!

I can't use it for TC, UNLESS I play around with it to get it screwed in and JUST right... WHich means a bit loose! A hair to tight, bounce right out of TC mode into wattage mode!Just like you describe! What you can try is to use a spacer and see if that helps... You can use almost anything, neoprene washer, 22mm x .5mm - 1mm... cut down a plastic cap from a soda/water bottle.....an adjustable 510 heat sink....

Point is, without using a spacer I can't use the Vapresso Gemini RTA on the RX200 for TC reliably at all! On the Cuboid, I can, but it won't screw down all the way to sit flush, but I can screw it down snug....snug on the RX200 equates to no TC! However, with the spacer it works perfect!

So, I am wondering if you are having the same issue, as we both have same mod, hardware and firmware versions.... I'm assuming good 316l wire, spaced coil/s????

BTW, Youtube reviewer DLSJvapes has some charts with device 510 depths, and atty 510 thread and pin lengths that demonstrate how bad the industry is, as far as no standard on the 510 pin length!

Here is the link :

http://bit.ly/1U4woi4

What atomizer are you trying to use???

As far as my issue, the Vapresso Gemini seems to have the longest overall 510 length of any of the documented attys! 5.6MM

To put that in perspective, the SMOK TFv4, which originally brought this issue to light has an overall length of : 4.84mm

So, if your atty is listed, and it's overall length is greater than about 4.8(plus or minus .4mm) this COULD be the problem!

If it IS the problem, even using that atty in wattage mode COULD lead to a failure of the 510 on the RX200....

BillW50 · May 5, 2016

@TechnoGeek: I measured the 510 pin travel and it is 3.9mm to 4.6mm. I just didn't screw my attys too tight and that worked fine. Although I later got those KidneyPuncher mod guards. They are just plastic washers and they are 0.4mm thick. You get 5 for 2 bucks. So with one you can screw down up to a 5mm 510. Two up to 5.4mm. And three for a 6mm 510. I use them on my other mods too since it stops attys from getting the mods all scratched up.

TechnoGeek · May 5, 2016

BillW50 said:
@TechnoGeek: I measured the 510 pin travel and it is 3.9mm to 4.6mm. I just didn't screw my attys too tight and that worked fine. Although I later got those KidneyPuncher mod guards. They are just plastic washers and they are 0.4mm thick. You get 5 for 2 bucks. So with one you can screw down up to a 5mm 510. Two up to 5.4mm. And three for a 6mm 510. I use them on my other mods too since it stops attys from getting the mods all scratched up.

Nice, I didn't see those when I was looking for something, so I got these.....

https://www.fasttech.com/p/2173201

10 for 7.39...The ones you got seem like a better option....cheaper, and a bit more flexible....

Wingsfan0310 · May 5, 2016

mjag said:
I was always hoping they would offer the RX200 in the DNA color option, thanks to Evolv for making this possible

If Joyetech/Wismec stole or reverse engineered Evolv's work (violated patents), I'm all for them trying to get them to stop. I'm not saying they did because I don't have all the facts.

In a broader scope. I've grown tired of some (not all) Chinese companies reverse engineering the world. Ir's obviously a lot cheaper to reverse engineer than have to spend the time and money to invent (R&D). IIRC Evolv was the first company to come out with TC (I'm not sure about VV/VW). They actually stand behind their product for a full year. If you want cheaper, there are other options, but don't expect to get the same quality or after sales service.

I'm sure this won't be a popular point of view so go ahead and fire away, I have think skin.

BillW50 · May 5, 2016

TechnoGeek said:
Nice, I didn't see those when I was looking for something, so I got these.....

https://www.fasttech.com/p/2173201

Oh wow! those are 0.04 inch or 1mm thick. I had some washers in my shop, but they were 1.1mm and that was too thick. My attys couldn't even reach the 510 pin.

Roadtrip635 · May 5, 2016

mjag said:
I was always hoping they would offer the RX200 in the DNA color option, thanks to Evolv for making this possible

Same here, I wanted that color option for the RX200 as well. I'm sure they will be releasing other color options, I'd also like a black and white one that I wouldn't have to mix and match doors and face plates. After seeing what the FDA did with the deeming for the Vape industry, it might be time to start building up the stash.

BillW50 · May 5, 2016

Wingsfan0310 said:
IIRC Evolv was the first company to come out with TC (I'm not sure about VV/VW).

The first mod to do VW was the Evolv Darwin.

mjag · May 5, 2016

Wingsfan0310 said:
If Joyetech/Wismec stole or reverse engineered Evolv's work (violated patents), I'm all for them trying to get them to stop. I'm not saying they did because I don't have all the facts.

In a broader scope. I've grown tired of some (not all) Chinese companies reverse engineering the world. Ir's obviously a lot cheaper to reverse engineer than have to spend the time and money to invent (R&D). IIRC Evolv was the first company to come out with TC (I'm not sure about VV/VW). They actually stand behind their product for a full year. If you want cheaper, there are other options, but don't expect to get the same quality or after sales service.

I'm sure this won't be a popular point of view so go ahead and fire away, I have think skin.

I agree with you Wing, I wasn't trying to slam Evolv, just happy to get the color option I wanted. I did have the DNA200 version and loved it but wound up selling it to a friend because I am just not into using the escribe software. Of course as soon as he got home with it he has a custom screen and already figured out all the tweeks for the DNA200 so it went to a better home. I really did love the color on the DNA200 over my black RX though, I was going to keep it just for that.

I am all for Evolv suing the shit out of wismec is they stole there hard work like thieves. It really does suck to put so much work into making a better product and some dirt bag company just stealing it and undercutting you. Engineers need to be compensated for the time and money they spend on developing products, if not then innovation will suffer.

TechnoGeek · May 5, 2016

BillW50 said:
Oh wow! those are 0.04 inch or 1mm thick. I had some washers in my shop, but they were 1.1mm and that was too thick. My attys couldn't even reach the 510 pin.

Yep, BUT work perfect for the Vapresso Gemini RTA that was giving me problems.... it's 510 is 5.6mm LONG.....

ademel692 · May 5, 2016

TechnoGeek said:
That's weird, I seem to have exactly the same as yours hardware 1.04, firmware 3.10....

View attachment 49948

One issue I do have is the 510 issue on the RX200 with certain attys...Example, the Vapresso Gemini RTA is the WORST! The 510 pin is way too long. ATTY doesn't sit flush. BUT even if you don't try to get it to sit flush, just snug, issues with TC!

I can't use it for TC, UNLESS I play around with it to get it screwed in and JUST right... WHich means a bit loose! A hair to tight, bounce right out of TC mode into wattage mode!Just like you describe! What you can try is to use a spacer and see if that helps... You can use almost anything, neoprene washer, 22mm x .5mm - 1mm... cut down a plastic cap from a soda/water bottle.....an adjustable 510 heat sink....

Point is, without using a spacer I can't use the Vapresso Gemini RTA on the RX200 for TC reliably at all! On the Cuboid, I can, but it won't screw down all the way to sit flush, but I can screw it down snug....snug on the RX200 equates to no TC! However, with the spacer it works perfect!

So, I am wondering if you are having the same issue, as we both have same mod, hardware and firmware versions.... I'm assuming good 316l wire, spaced coil/s????

BTW, Youtube reviewer DLSJvapes has some charts with device 510 depths, and atty 510 thread and pin lengths that demonstrate how bad the industry is, as far as no standard on the 510 pin length!

Here is the link :

http://bit.ly/1U4woi4

What atomizer are you trying to use???

As far as my issue, the Vapresso Gemini seems to have the longest overall 510 length of any of the documented attys! 5.6MM

View attachment 49951

To put that in perspective, the SMOK TFv4, which originally brought this issue to light has an overall length of : 4.84mm

View attachment 49953

So, if your atty is listed, and it's overall length is greater than about 4.8(plus or minus .4mm) this COULD be the problem!

If it IS the problem, even using that atty in wattage mode COULD lead to a failure of the 510 on the RX200....

I have the tfv4 mini , sorry , i always just use the term tfv4 universally i really should stop that lol

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

HDMontana · May 6, 2016

I pre ordered one from 101 Vape a little while ago. I am currently using an istick 200 watt, that I got a few days ago. I really like the screens on my cuboid and evics. I was hoping a 3 battery, large screen would surface.

HD

Roadtrip635 · May 7, 2016

I'm curious to see if they've made any changes to the chip. I'm looking forward to getting my hands on this.

TechnoGeek · May 7, 2016

I'm happy with the new screen. If they fixed the 510, more than happy. The chip works fine for me, no problems with ss316l. Only problem is with the 510 pin and certain attys.

Roadtrip635 said:
I'm curious to see if they've made any changes to the chip. I'm looking forward to getting my hands on this.

ej1024 · May 7, 2016

I'm buying this
This the kind of mod that you buy
For sure,That SCREEN THOUGH

VAPE ON

Roadtrip635 · May 8, 2016

TechnoGeek said:
I'm happy with the new screen. If they fixed the 510, more than happy. The chip works fine for me, no problems with ss316l. Only problem is with the 510 pin and certain attys.

I think it may have been Nitro on Mod Envy on Saturday Night that said it was the same chip that was used in the Cuboid. Agreed, as long as they improved the 510, I'll be happy.

Hottvapz · May 8, 2016

Breazy_Com said:
I want two of them lol

Now now don't be greedy lol

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk

Vapomizer · May 9, 2016

I wonder in what way did the 510 change? i don't see any official detailing of the change in Wismec site or even an indication that a change indeed happened.

In Wismec's website for the new RX200S it says: "Stainless Steel Thread and Spring Connector: The exquisite stainless steel spring loaded 510 connector makes the device much wear-resisting and adaptable."

and in the same website for the older and first Reuleaux DNA200 it says: "Stainless Steel Thread and Spring Connector: The stainless thread makes the device much wear-resisting and the spring connector greatly increases its adaptability."

Did they make the 510 deeper than previous models? did they make the spring loaded positive pin has a longer/deeper travel? and what is the evidence or source?

From the two official descriptions above it looks like the 510 in both the DNA200 and the RX200S are the same.

I am very interested in verifying this this piece of information coz it is the determining factor if i will get this mod or not

ej1024 · May 9, 2016

Vapomizer said:
I wonder in what way did the 510 change? i don't see any official detailing of the change in Wismec site or even an indication that a change indeed happened.

In Wismec's website for the new RX200S it says: "Stainless Steel Thread and Spring Connector: The exquisite stainless steel spring loaded 510 connector makes the device much wear-resisting and adaptable."

and in the same website for the older and first Reuleaux DNA200 it says: "Stainless Steel Thread and Spring Connector: The stainless thread makes the device much wear-resisting and the spring connector greatly increases its adaptability."

Did they make the 510 deeper than previous models? did they make the spring loaded positive pin has a longer/deeper travel? and what is the evidence or source?

From the two official descriptions above it looks like the 510 in both the DNA200 and the RX200S are the same.

I am very interested in verifying this this piece of information coz it is the determining factor if i will get this mod or not

They made it whatever they call it, so it won't fuck up like the RX200...

Spyg0at · May 9, 2016

ej1024 said:
They made it whatever they call it, so it won't fuck up like the RX200...

I'm thinking they gave the pin more travel or a better spring rate or milled the keyway some. Seems the RX200 pin would bind occasionally, though mine never did.

ej1024 · May 9, 2016

Spyg0at said:
I'm thinking they gave the pin more travel or a better spring rate or milled the keyway some. Seems the RX200 pin would bind occasionally, though mine never did.

Hopefully they did... Another modified joyetech chip... Gotta love them

Wingsfan0310 · May 9, 2016

At this point it's all just conjecture, until someone gets it and measures the travel of the new one vs old one. I would think if they really changed it I would see new and improved or something along those lines.

Cheers,
Steve

Vapomizer · May 9, 2016

Wingsfan0310 said:
At this point it's all just conjecture, until someone gets it and measures the travel of the new one vs old one. I would think if they really changed it I would see new and improved or something along those lines.

Cheers,
Steve

Exactly my thinking, if they actually changed it they would mention it clearly and maybe even brag about it a little as one strong selling factor, but as it stands i doubt it has been changed at all especially when the iStick TC200W that was released just few days before it has the old short 510 with most RTAs and RDAs are sticking out, only few tanks sit flush on it, if they change their 510, they do it for all their devices not just one, i hope it changed, but i have a feeling that it is more of the same, beyond the bigger screen i think everything else is the same.

sychosis · May 9, 2016

Anyone got the exact release date ?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

mjag · May 9, 2016

According to 101vape they estimate ship date of 5-17-16. https://101vape.com/mods/1105-reuleaux-rx200s-200w-tc-box-mod-by-wismec-jay-bo-designs.html

As far as the improvements on the 510 this is what is in the description from the link I posted: To power your build, Wismec and Jay Bo listened to fans of their product and improved the 510 pin.

I preordered mine, can't wait to get it.

Roadtrip635 · May 11, 2016

I'm curious to see which battery sled they will use for this, I hope it's the one from the RX200 and not from the DNA200 one.

Wingsfan0310 · May 11, 2016

Roadtrip635 said:
I'm curious to see which battery sled they will use for this, I hope it's the one from the RX200 and not from the DNA200 one.

The only reason they used the sled with the rings on the Reuleaux DNA200 is because it doesn't have reverse battery protection built in, at least in the sense we think of it. At the time the chip was being developed, it was meant to used with a 3s Lipo, which doesn't need normal reverse battery protection because the connector can only be plugged in one way so Evolv but a 25 amp fuse on the board for reverse battery protection (or any other problem that might occur to isolate the chip from the power source). When Evolv decided to support dual 18650's they recommended a daughter board also be used to offer traditional reverse battery protection. Wismec/Joyetech decided to go with the cheaper solution of those PITA rings for mechanical reverse battery connection.

Long story short, I see no reason why they would use the DNA200 sled on the RX200S. Sorry for the long winded backstory, but I wanted to explain why I think they won't use that sled.

PS Hcigar on the VT133 is using a daughter board so it doesn't use the rings either. The daughter board is what should have been used as per Evolv with the DNA200 chip when not using a Lipo pack.

Cheers,
Steve.

ej1024 · May 11, 2016

Wingsfan0310 said:
The only reason they used the sled with the rings on the Reuleaux DNA200 is because it doesn't have reverse battery protection built in, at least in the sense we think of it. At the time the chip was being developed, it was meant to used with a 3s Lipo, which doesn't need normal reverse battery protection because the connector can only be plugged in one way so Evolv but a 25 amp fuse on the board for reverse battery protection (or any other problem that might occur to isolate the chip from the power source). When Evolv decided to support dual 18650's they recommended a daughter board also be used to offer traditional reverse battery protection. Wismec/Joyetech decided to go with the cheaper solution of those PITA rings for mechanical reverse battery connection.

Long story short, I see no reason why they would use the DNA200 sled on the RX200S. Sorry for the long winded backstory, but I wanted to explain why I think they won't use that sled.

PS Hcigar on the VT133 is using a daughter board so it doesn't use the rings either. The daughter board is what should have been used per Evolv.

Cheers,
Steve.

I have x2 RELEAUX I dont really find the sled a con
People just lazy!

Wingsfan0310 · May 11, 2016

ej1024 said:
I have x2 RELEAUX I dont really find the sled a con
People just lazy!

I don't mind the Reuleaux DNA200 sled, but you do have to be careful so as not to rip your 18650 battery wrappers when removing them. Some people also have had connection issues because of the sled since there really isn't a strict standard on 18650's (they aren't all exactly the same length, etc. It's even worse when it comes to 26650"s).

Cheers,
Steve

Edit @ej1024 Do you have two to the RX200's or DNA200 Reuleaux? I'm talking about the DNA200 Reuleaux sled.

mjag · May 11, 2016

Roadtrip635 said:
I'm curious to see which battery sled they will use for this, I hope it's the one from the RX200 and not from the DNA200 one.

Looks like the are using the RX200 style sled without the rings around the positive contacts in this video:

Good thing too, I had both versions and you had to be more careful with the DNA200 to not rip the battery wrap when removing.

BillW50 · May 11, 2016

Wingsfan0310 said:
Long story short, I see no reason why they would use the DNA200 sled on the RX200S. Sorry for the long winded backstory, but I wanted to explain why I think they won't use that sled.

Yes, but they do show the DNA sled in the photos. This begs the question whether the RX200S even has reverse polarity protection? And if it was the same as the RX200, but with a larger screen... why wasn't it called the RX250?

Wingsfan0310 said:
PS Hcigar on the VT133 is using a daughter board so it doesn't use the rings either. The daughter board is what should have been used as per Evolv with the DNA200 chip when not using a Lipo pack.

The Reuleaux RX200 doesn't even hardly have any space free for air! There just isn't any room for reverse polarity protection. Heck just using thicker gauge wire it is super tight in there. Jaybo even mentioned this in a video there wasn't room for the protection. The HCigar VT133 is taller than the Reuleaux, just enough to fit a reverse polarity protection board inside.

UPDATE: In the first batch video above, we don't see the protection rings.

Here it Comes! The WISMEC Reuleaux RX200S

Excellence In Service

VU Sponsors