Should I use an e-cigarette to stop smoking?
please help me by sharing your opinion.
[McClane and Zeus are speeding through Central Park]
Zeus: Are you aiming for these people?
John McClane: No. Well, maybe that mime.
This seems like we were supposed to be mined for info.
But there’s general vaping info all over this forum and the Net, in general.
Careful! If you would have taken another step, we might have been scraping you up with a spatula.
In seriousness, this forum makes use of some Google api, That means the N.S.A has access to information here. If they do then so does L.E.Os (Local Enforcement Officers), F.B.I, C.I.A and likely all 14 different sets of Eyes in the world. Smile and wave, you're still free in your mind and smiling confuses everyone, even yourself.
That's not the point though. Intimidation is the point. Think about it, even here on a forum classed and pawned off as "underground" we still are scraped by surveillance. This leads to a great deal of self censorship, possibly paranoia. All the better, because if we self censor it means we're controlled by psychological conditioning. And if in need of it they can easily get a court order sending you to the mental health asylum/s locked away from everything.
"Gee your honor, they were spouting paranoid conspiracy theories online". Which of course it won't be a proper judge by Black's Law dictionary but rather a judicial administrator and yes there is a vast difference in the two.
What is a conspiracy theory? It is any theory that two, or more people make plans. That is all it is in plain English. Everyone knows two, or more people who make plans. All you need to do is look at your local grocery store, the local McDonald's, local Wal-Mart. These are all examples of two, or more people making and enacting plans. Now, everyone is a conspiracy theorist. You're welcome. And in these cases the theories are proven factual, they do occur.
What do "THEY" (The Hierarchy Enslaving You) spend for that profound level of control? Next to nothing or nothing at all.
A judge is for court de jure as in Common Law, Law of Land (These are the same, just called differently by different people) Common Law goes back into England and came to exist in the 12th century, it was the basis of the Magna Carta, which later was adapted to our Bill of Rights. Contrary to common belief, judges do not instruct juries on matters of Law. In fact judges take instruction from juries. Judges though do help juries understand the rules of procedure for courts.
We don't use the law of the Land anymore but Law of the Sea, Law of Admiralty, Law of Commerce, Holy Roman Law, Cannon Law, Maritime law (All the same the kind of law, merely just different names). Judicial administrators only care about letting Capital keep making profit, it's about commerce being undisturbed for them, they got greasy palms.
There is a third version of law called Law of the Air. It has three precepts and supersedes the other two forms of law.
1. Do not harm any living being.
2. Harm nor steal any property of any living being.
3. Keep the peace.
That's the Law of Air. You might notice similarity to the Wiccan 'Rede. All law except Natural Law/s (Law of Gravity, Law of Heredity and so on) come from religions. Common Law comes from Mosaic Law which is common to Judaism, Christianity, Islam. All three of these religions are entwined in some fashion to Abrahamic religion, religion/s of Abraham. Apologies if the truth offends Muslims but it is the truth according to history, it is what happened. Abraham lived before Mohamed and in fact Mohamed is likely descended from Abraham, ergo Mosaic Law applied to all three religions by means of fatherly traditionalism.
I know this from actually researching it due to something of its nature having direct effect on my life. You kind of wake up after you're denied help that should exist but in reality doesn't because the system is corrupted from its core outward.
After I'm buried deep under ground I expect thick vapor will ooze eerily into the moonlight out of the ground above me.
In case you forgot where you were
Lol probably me too!After I'm buried deep under ground I expect thick vapor will ooze eerily into the moonlight out of the ground above me.
After I'm buried deep under ground I expect thick vapor will ooze eerily into the moonlight out of the ground above me.
it is starting to look like half of the noobs are trolls....Sometimes, not today, but sometimes, I feel kinda sorry for stupid people who wander in here and think they're going to pull some shit on us.
I tried twice but didn't work for me.
Only if you seriously want to quit. Only thing that worked for me.Should I use an e-cigarette to stop smoking? I am little bit confused, please help me by sharing your opinion.
Muhahaha! My new desktop background. it'll drive my wife sane! Yes!!!!
Drat! The animation don't work and I don't feel like coding up an xml or html file with css to create a desktop with animated images. Oh well.
Only if you seriously want to quit. Only thing that worked for me.
It’s on Tappy on their gif search button. Just look for trolls.
That's fine and well but when I save the gif image itself the animation does not work on my copy. That means I would need to embed it into an xml, html file and set up my desktop to use such a file as a desktop "image". Using LXDE as a desktop environment isn't conducive of doing that. I could possibly script, or code some hack to do it but it's not worth the hassle for me. I'm sure it is likely someone has but even then using someone else's hack dulls the idea. And yes, I admit that's a bit of hacking pride.
Got to replaying this post. No sis, I'm not angry. I was merely 'splainin'. Sometimes I might talk/write with a tone which seems I'm angry. For whatever reason me 'splaining' seems to read/sound like that. It's part of why I "hang back" a lot, I don't like upsetting folks by just explaining how things go, or do. Then, i get accused of "sneaking up" on folks when I don't try, too so, ... .
"Oh the horrid trolls! I must go to my safe place." LMAO!
Right. Sure, I'll go hide.
lolYes usage of an e-cigarette stop smoking
To buy best and cheap e-cigarette online visit- https://smokdeals.com/
Unfortunately, the final decision isn't up to me.@Huckleberried ^^^^^^^ You let him stay? The stealer of Lucy’s NETs posts?
Should I use an e-cigarette to stop smoking? I am little bit confused, please help me by sharing your opinion.
How much do you really know about "The Vape Company's" products if you never used any of them? You never spoke to your employer to learn more?Should I use an e-cigarette to stop smoking? I am little bit confused, please help me by sharing your opinion.
I smoked for 34 years before switching to vaping.
Why is anyone still responding to this thread? Obviously OP is not what he wants us to think he is - has a vendor badge and is asking a question like that about vaping?
Seriously, y'all, don't waste your time.
Compared with no support or only behavioral support, e-cigarettes containing nicotine may be more helpful in quitting smoking (4 studies; 2,312 people). For every 100 smokers who use nicotine-containing e-cigarettes to quit, 10 people may successfully quit smoking. In contrast, for every 100 smokers who use nicotine replacement therapy or nicotine-free e-cigarettes, 6 have successfully quit.Should I use an e-cigarette to stop smoking? I am little bit confused, please help me by sharing your opinion.
Compared with no support or only behavioral support, e-cigarettes containing nicotine may be more helpful in quitting smoking (4 studies; 2,312 people). For every 100 smokers who use nicotine-containing e-cigarettes to quit, 10 people may successfully quit smoking. In contrast, for every 100 smokers who use nicotine replacement therapy or nicotine-free e-cigarettes, 6 have successfully quit.
Compared with no support or only behavioral support, e-cigarettes containing nicotine may be more helpful in quitting smoking (4 studies; 2,312 people). For every 100 smokers who use nicotine-containing e-cigarettes to quit, 10 people may successfully quit smoking. In contrast, for every 100 smokers who use nicotine replacement therapy or nicotine-free e-cigarettes, 6 have successfully quit.
Restricted proof methods e-cigarettes are just suggested as second-line treatment in the new RACGP rules. Nicotine-containing e-cigarettes are not viewed as a first-line treatment for smoking cessation.Vaping gives sensations like smoking a cigarette. They give taste and throat vibes that are near smoking
They were actually pointing out other nicotine replacement therapies had less success than vaping. Here let me unpack it for you.One might ask, where did you get your info? If vaping isn’t effective, why are you here? Please, be a Big Tobacco shill elsewhere.
Compared with no support or only behavioral support, e-cigarettes containing nicotine may be more helpful in quitting smoking (4 studies; 2,312 people). For every 100 smokers who use nicotine-containing e-cigarettes to quit, 10 people may successfully quit smoking.
In contrast, for every 100 smokers who use nicotine replacement therapy or nicotine-free e-cigarettes, 6 have successfully quit.