Become a Patron!

To Date which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for & why?

Which US Presidential candidate will you be voting for?


  • Total voters
    237
Status
Not open for further replies.

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
But of course a judge who went to law school would never beat his wife, be a druggie, or drive drunk, right?

That's the point. The argument I quoted for that comment was this one;

you think being judge somehow makes you honest or smart , that a law degree makes you immune to cruelty and corruption....that being a congressman gaurantees mental fitness ..

The morality of the Judges is moot in this context. It's a wash.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I donno pat. To me it looks like we finally have someone up there who gives a shit about us, the working class stiffs. Despite massive Democrats AND republican opposition. A guy actually doing what a president is suppose to do. How long these trade agreements been so hard against us? Thats the presidents job and we actually have one doing his job. For how many decades did we have all those massive regulations. Since Trump dealt with them its obviously a presidential duty. So It doesnt matter if he does anymore this term or not, unless he fucks up really bad he has my vote for re-election. Your right, a lot more needs doing. I agree %1000 on that, but he is only on man and has done more than any president I have ever seen that helps us. That alone earns my loyalty.
I don't disagree. He has accomplished more than I ever thought possible so he has my vote as well, but he needs to commence mass deportations now instead of keeping these people in the country as an amnesty bargaining chip to pass immigration reform as he is apparently doing. Kirstjen Nielsen was obviously working against Trump the whole time on deportations & hopefully now that she is gone, more will occur. Trumps base will forgive certain small amnesty concessions to effect meaningful immigration reform centered around DACA, but they will not accept a wholesale amnesty. He recently won a decision to allow illegals to be returned to Mexico to await their amnesty hearings & he better damn well avail himself of that hard won latitude now or many in his base will falter in their continued support.

The deeply concerning point is without Election reform, neither of our votes will matter. The Democrats openly stole upwards of 47 Congressional Seats in 2018 midterms through voter fraud & no one is yet under arrest except for a Texas Mayor. We have yet to see any arrests or reforms resulting from any investigations into the fraudulent 2018 election & Democrats are working to keep Trump off the Ballot & game the Electoral College in the next election. 2020 will be wholesale Democrat & Rino Election Fraud & Trump will not win unless things change on censorship, Voter ID, preservation of the Electoral College by challenging State actions to nullify it in SCOTUS & institute Election integrity reforms. That is a fact.
 
Last edited:

Time

Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
I'm not sure how you guys got into a Judge Dredd Border Patrol discussion here. Sadly I had to stop & search if Trump or Barr had suggested anything of the like & I can't find it.

International law state that legitimate Asylum seekers must seek asylum in the nearest bordering country. That immediately means anyone not from Mexico is not eligible for asylum, period. No need for a hearing except to confirm point of origin, deny admittance & deport back to Mexico where they entered from. From there they are Mexico's problem. Apprehend all at the border, bus them all to the border crossings where judges are staffed to rubber stamp them before releasing them to Mexican Authorities.

Anyone from Mexico is free to apply for Asylum, and await their hearing in Mexico. The key is to make them await their hearings in Mexico, not the interior of the USA. As soon as the ccaravan criminals see thousands upon thousand turned away at the border, this shit will stop.

Here, the second one is the one causing problems. US Law. Not International Law.

https://immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-u-s-asylum-process/

Affirmative asylum process – Individuals can apply for asylum affirmatively if they are physically present in the U.S., regardless of how they entered the country within one year after arrival. They can also apply for asylum at ports of entry. In an affirmative asylum process, an USCIS officer decides whether the individual will be granted asylum in the U.S. If USCIS denies an asylum application in the affirmative asylum process after the individual’s visa has expired, he or she is referred for removal but can utilize the defensive asylum process to renew his or her request for asylum.

Defensive asylum process – Individuals can seek asylum as a defense against removal after they are apprehended by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents in the U.S. or at one of the ports of entry without valid visa. A person in the defensive asylum process requests asylum in immigration court where an immigration judge decides whether or not the applicant will be granted asylum.

Under the defensive asylum process, applicants must go through the immigration court system, which faces significant backlogs. As of July 2018, there were over 733,000 pending immigration cases and the average wait time for an immigration hearing was 721 days.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
Here, the second one is the one causing problems. US Law. Not International Law.

https://immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-u-s-asylum-process/

Affirmative asylum process – Individuals can apply for asylum affirmatively if they are physically present in the U.S., regardless of how they entered the country within one year after arrival. They can also apply for asylum at ports of entry. In an affirmative asylum process, an USCIS officer decides whether the individual will be granted asylum in the U.S. If USCIS denies an asylum application in the affirmative asylum process after the individual’s visa has expired, he or she is referred for removal but can utilize the defensive asylum process to renew his or her request for asylum.

Defensive asylum process – Individuals can seek asylum as a defense against removal after they are apprehended by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents in the U.S. or at one of the ports of entry without valid visa. A person in the defensive asylum process requests asylum in immigration court where an immigration judge decides whether or not the applicant will be granted asylum.

Under the defensive asylum process, applicants must go through the immigration court system, which faces significant backlogs. As of July 2018, there were over 733,000 pending immigration cases and the average wait time for an immigration hearing was 721 days.
“Expedited Removal” and Deportation Under U.S. Immigration Law
https://www.shouselaw.com/immigration/expedited_removal

upload_2019-5-14_14-15-38.png
upload_2019-5-14_13-55-9.png
 
Last edited:

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
He has no choice in the matter. The law says they get to have their day in court.

Trump: Congress needs to 'get rid of the whole asylum system' -
Looks like a viable choice to me and one that will help alleviate the current crisis at the border without moving migrants to the interior. Happened right after Trump threatened to send them all to sanctuary cities....The 9th suddenly saw the error of it's ways.

Appeals Court Rules That Asylum-Seekers Can Be Made To Wait in Mexico...

https://www.npr.org/2019/05/08/721293828/appeals-court-rules-trump-administration-can-keep-sending-asylum-seekers-to-mexi' target=
May 08, 2019 · Appeals Court Rules That Asylum-Seekers Can Be Made To Wait In Mexico A Ninth Circuit panel overturned a lower court's injunction on the administration's policy requiring asylum-seekers to remain ...
 
Last edited:

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
‘DUDE, THAT WOULD BE SO FUNNY’: Navy Finally Releases Findings From Probe Into ‘Sky Penis’ Drawing

upload_2019-5-14_14-23-8.png


The EWO broached it first, according to the investigation.

“My initial reaction was no, bad,” the pilot wrote in a statement after the incident. “But for some reason still unknown to me, I eventually decided to do it.”

Their sky penis plan of attack was captured on their cockpit video recording system, a transcript of which is included in the investigation.

“Draw a giant penis,” the EWO said. “That would be awesome.”

“What did you do on your flight?” the pilot joked. “Oh, we turned dinosaurs into sky penises.”

“You should totally try to draw a penis,” the EWO advised.

“I could definitely draw one, that would be easy,” the pilot boasted. “I could basically draw a figure eight and turn around and come back. I’m gonna go down, grab some speed and hopefully get out of the contrail layer so they’re not connected to each other.”

They theorized on the second-order effects of their nascent sky drawing.

“Dude, that would be so funny,” the pilot said. “Airliner’s coming back on their way into Seattle, just this big (expletive)ing, giant penis. We could almost draw a vein in the middle of it too.”

And then, this exchange:

“Balls are going to be a little lopsided,” the pilot advised.

“Balls are complete,” he reported moments later. “I just gotta navigate a little bit over here for the shaft.”

“Which way is the shaft going?” the EWO asked.

“The shaft will go to the left,” the pilot answered.

“It’s gonna be a wide shaft,” the EWO noted.

“I don’t wanna make it just like 3 balls,” the pilot said.

“Let’s do it,” the EWO said. “Oh, the head of that penis is going to be thick.”
 

PoppaVic

Gold Contributor
Member For 4 Years
:
Happened right after Trump threatened to send them all to sanctuary cities....The 9th :
He still needs to be shopping for those fund on that task: just setting them back a HALF-STEP is not "success". Make them pay play.
 

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
As soon as I read "working with" I translate as "colluding-with".. Either fucking investigate with pitchforks and knives, or bend over.
Can't argue with ya there. I've been suspect of Coats for quite a while now as he very much seems to be more of a hindrance to Trump than a help & Haspell was the fucking UK CIA Station Chief when they were spying on Trump for Christ's sake. To expect either them to further the investigation & not impede it in any way is somewhat naive at best

 
Last edited:

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
This girl has her shit together....Mark Dice mentioned her this morning....

They have already given her multiple strikes on her videos & are striving to ban her now as Dice discussed. Really wanted to see the Burka one but it has already been pulled from youtube.

Buzzfeed Attacks Children Now – Sends Its Trolls to Harass 14-Year-Old Conservative YouTube Star cuz They Don’t Like Her Humor

Edit: Censorship will not be tolerated. Anons reloaded her video on Bitchute out of principle.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/CbEfkEmVPEpN/
 
Last edited:

Tpat591

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
gqogvyw8i5y21.jpg
 

chopdoc

VU Donator
Platinum Contributor
Member For 4 Years
ECF Refugee
They have already given her multiple strikes on her videos & are striving to ban her now as Dice discussed. Really wanted to see the Burka one but it has already been pulled from youtube.

Buzzfeed Attacks Children Now – Sends Its Trolls to Harass 14-Year-Old Conservative YouTube Star cuz They Don’t Like Her Humor

Edit: Censorship will not be tolerated. Anons reloaded her video on Bitchute out of principle.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/CbEfkEmVPEpN/

Thought it was mini AOC but it wasnt. Yet I am sure they will go after her too soon.
 

pulsevape

Diamond Contributor
Member For 4 Years
They have already given her multiple strikes on her videos & are striving to ban her now as Dice discussed. Really wanted to see the Burka one but it has already been pulled from youtube.

Buzzfeed Attacks Children Now – Sends Its Trolls to Harass 14-Year-Old Conservative YouTube Star cuz They Don’t Like Her Humor

Edit: Censorship will not be tolerated. Anons reloaded her video on Bitchute out of principle.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/CbEfkEmVPEpN/
the burka one was brilliant...see it if you can find it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VU Sponsors

Top